The Morphometrical Variation of adult’s Human Face in Nepal

Authors

  • Yadav SK Ph.D. Anatomy Scholar, School of Pharmacy and Medical Sciences, Singhania University Pacheri Bari, Jhunjhunu, Rajasthan, India.
  • Srivastva AK Professor, Department of Anatomy, Saraswati Dental College Lucknow, India.
  • Singh AR Professor, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Saraswati Dental College Lucknow, India.
  • Chandra N Emeritus Professor, Hind Institute of Medical Science, Barabanki Road, Lucknow, India.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55677/IJCSMR/V3I3-03/2023

Keywords:

Anthropometry, Cephalometery Prosopic Index, Hypereurisopic etc.

Abstract

Background: The evaluation and measurement of human body dimensions are achieved by physical anthropometry. Cephalometery is a branch of anthropometry science in which the head and face anatomical dimensions are measured. This research was conducted in view of the importance of anthropometric indices of the face in forensic medicine, surgery, paediatrics and medical imaging.

Material and Methods: This cross-sectional study was set up to determine and compare the face shapes Nepalese populations aged between 17 & 30 -year-old males and females.  The length and width of faces were determined by using Digital vernier calliper and martin spreading calliper respectively. The shape of faces in among male and female of Nepalese population were determined and was compared with other studied and population.

Results: In this research, we found that mean values face height and width among male and female were 115.78±7.02 and 112.78±4.7 and were 127.19±6.59 and 130.18±7.44 respectively. Prosopic Index among male and female were 89.01±3.82 and 88.83±3.82 respectively. The result showed that both male and female was found to round face. This showed that Nepali population face was Mesoprosopic (round) PI= 85 <PI<89.9.

Conclusion: This study determined the possible effect of ethnicity on the diversity of face shapes in males and females adult Nepalese and was found to Mesoprosopic face.

References

Omotoso DR, Oludiran OO, Sakpa CL. Nasofacial Anthropometry of Adult Bini Tribe In Nigeria. Afr. J. Biomed. Res. 2011; 14: 219 -21.

Gray H. Gray’s Anatomy. 40th ed. London: Churchill and Livingstone, 2008: p.409-21.

Golalipour MJ, Jahanshahi M, Haidari K. The variation of head and face shapes in female newborns in the South- East of the Caspian sea (Iran-Gorgan). European Journal Article 2005; 9(2): 95-98.

Porter J P. The average African American male face: an anthropometric analysis. Arch Facial Plastic Surgery 2004; 6 (2): 78-81.

Hennessy RJ, Mclearie S, Kinsella A. Facial surface analysis by 3D laser scanning and geometric morphometrics in relation to sexual dimorphism in cerebral – craniofacial morphogenesis and cognitive function. Journal of Anatomy 2005; 207: 285- 93.

Chamella M. Biological anthropometry, Gostar Publisher. 1st ed Tehran. 1997;75.

Zweiz BE. Esthetic analysus of the cervicofacial region. Atlas Oral Maxillofaci Surg Clin North Am 2000; 8:1-11.

Panero, J. Human dimension and inferior space. First Edn : Architeetual press Ltd. London. 1979; p15.

Williams P, Bannister LH, Berry MM, Collins P, Dyson M, Dussak, JE, Ferguson, MWJ. Gray’s anatomy. In : Skeletal system. 38th Edn; Churchill Livingston. London. 1995; p : 607-612.

Raji JM. Morphological Evaluation of Head and Face Shapes in a North - Eastern Nigerian Population. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences 2010; 8:3380-3410.

Mani R. Comparative Study of Facial Index of Rajput Community of Bikaner District of Rajasthan and other communities and races. Asian Journal of Biomedical and Pharmaceutical Sciences, 2013, 3: (20), 5-7.

Zahra H, Sagheb HRM, Mugehi MH. morphological evaluatin of head and face in 18-25 year old women in southest of Iran. J.Med. Sci. 2006; 6(3) 400-404.

Xuetong Z, Sankui W,Wei Z, Xianfeng W. Measurement and study of the nose and face and their correlations in the young adult of Han nationality. Plast Reconstruct Surg 1990;85(4):532-6.

K.P. Ashok. Cephalo-facial variation among Onges. Anthropologist 2006; 28 (4), 245-249.

Farkas LG, Katic MJ, Forest CR. Comparison of craniofacial measurements of young adult African- American and north American white males and females. Ann Plast Surg. 2007; 59 (6):692-8.

Ngeow WC, Staljunid. Cranio facial anthropometric norms of Malaysian Indians. Indian Journal of Dental Research.2009; (20): 313-319.

Shetti VR, Pai SR, Sneha GK, GuptaC. Chethan P, Soumya. Study of prosopic (facial) index of Indian and Malaysian students. Int. J. Morphol. 2011: 29 (3), 1018-1021.

L. Du. et al. Head and face anthropometric survey of Chinese worker’s. Ann Ocup Hyg. 2008. 52(8) 773- 782. Doi:10:1093/ ann. Hyg/men056

Chhabra N, Mishra BK. Sexual dimorphism and ethnic variations in facial index; a study done on north Indian adults. Int J Health Sci Res. 2015; 5(4):109-115.

Downloads

Published

2023-03-29

How to Cite

Yadav SK, Srivastva AK, Singh AR, & Chandra N. (2023). The Morphometrical Variation of adult’s Human Face in Nepal. International Journal of Clinical Science and Medical Research, 3(3), 58–62. https://doi.org/10.55677/IJCSMR/V3I3-03/2023