AI-Based Protocol Assistant in Pelvic Floor Ultrasonography: Development and Impact on Workflow Adherence and Efficiency

Author's Information:

Helwini Istiqomah 

Master of Applied Diagnostic Imaging, Health Polytechnic, Ministry of Health of the Republic of Indonesia, Semarang, Indonesia

Diyah Fatmasari 

Master of Applied Dental and Oral Therapist, Health Polytechnic, Ministry of Health of the Republic of Indonesia, Semarang, Indonesia

Ahmad Hariri 

Radiodiagnostic and Radiotherapy Technic, Pertamedika College of Health Sciences, Jakarta, Indonesia

Siti Masrochah

Master of Applied Diagnostic Imaging, Health Polytechnic, Ministry of Health of the Republic of Indonesia, Semarang, Indonesia

Gatot Murti Wibowo

Master of Applied Diagnostic Imaging, Health Polytechnic, Ministry of Health of the Republic of Indonesia, Semarang, Indonesia

Vol 06 No 04 (2026):Volume 06 Issue 04 April 2026

Page No.: 97-110

Abstract:

Background: Pelvic floor ultrasonography (PFUS) is a highly operator-dependent imaging modality in which variability in image acquisition, procedural sequencing, and documentation may reduce diagnostic reliability and reproducibility. Although standardized protocols are available, consistent real-time implementation remains challenging. Artificial Intelligence (AI) has increasingly been explored as a workflow-support tool to improve standardization and reduce operator dependency in medical imaging. 

Objective: This study aimed to develop and evaluate an AI-based Protocol Assistant to support structured workflow execution in pelvic floor ultrasonography. 

Methods: This study used a Research and Development approach with a modified 4D model limited to the Define, Design, and Develop stages. The system was designed to translate standardized PFUS protocols into stepwise procedural guidance integrated with workflow control and structured documentation. Feasibility was assessed through expert validation using Aiken’s V coefficient. Initial functional evaluation employed a one-group pretest-posttest design involving 50 sonographers performing examinations without and with system assistance. Outcomes included protocol adherence and examination time. Data were analyzed descriptively and with the Wilcoxon Signed-Rank Test. 

Results: The system demonstrated very high content validity, with Aiken’s V values of at least 0.98 across all evaluated components. Protocol adherence improved significantly, with protocol loss decreasing from 16.7% without system assistance to 0.0% with the Protocol Assistant (p < 0.05). Examination time was also significantly reduced after implementation (p < 0.05). 

Conclusion: The AI-based Protocol Assistant showed strong preliminary feasibility as a workflow-support system for PFUS, improving protocol adherence and examination efficiency. Further studies are needed to assess diagnostic accuracy, reproducibility, and generalizability across clinical settings.

KeyWords:

pelvic floor ultrasonography, artificial intelligence, workflow support, protocol adherence, examination efficiency, medical imaging standardization

References:

  1. Alshiek, J., Murad‐Regadas, S. M., Mellgren, A., Glanc, P., Khatri, G., Quiroz, L. H., Weinstein, M. M., Rostaminia, G., Oliveira, L., Arif‐Tiwari, H., Ferrari, L., Bordeianou, L., & Shobeiri, S. A. (2023). Consensus Definitions and Interpretation Templates for Dynamic Ultrasound Imaging of Defecatory Pelvic Floor Disorders. Urogynecology. https://doi.org/10.1097/spv.0000000000001332
  2. Atılgan, A. E., & Altuntaş, Ş. L. (2020). Mesh-Related Complications of Laparoscopic Lateral Suspension. Obstetrics & Gynecology International Journal, 11(4). https://doi.org/10.15406/ogij.2020.11.00513
  3. Bellussi, F., & Dietz, H. P. (2021). Postpartum Ultrasound for the Diagnosis of Obstetrical Anal Sphincter Injury. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology MFM, 3(6), 100421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajogmf.2021.100421
  4. Bernard, T. (2025). Sugar Shack 4.0: Practical Demonstration of an IIoT-Based Event-Driven Automation System. https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2510.15708
  5. Bilgiç, D., & Beji, N. K. (2020). How Do Urinary Incontinence Types Affect Sexual Function and Quality of Life for Turkish Women? Luts Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms, 12(3), 253–259. https://doi.org/10.1111/luts.12314
  6. Bø, K., Anglès‐Acedo, S., Batra, A., Brækken, I. H., Chan, Y. L., Ferreira, C. H. J., Kruger, J., Yadav, M., & Dumoulin, C. (2022). International Urogynecology Consultation Chapter 3 Committee 2; Conservative Treatment of Patient With Pelvic Organ Prolapse: Pelvic Floor Muscle Training. International Urogynecology Journal, 33(10), 2633–2667. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-022-05324-0
  7. Botoncea, M., Molnar, C., Butiurcă, V. O., Nicolescu, C., & Molnar-Varlam, C. (2025). Artificial Intelligence in the Diagnosis and Imaging-Based Assessment of Pelvic Organ Prolapse: A Scoping Review. Medicina, 61(8), 1497. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina61081497
  8. Braga, A., Galli, L., Caccia, G., Amato, G., Papadia, A., Torella, M., Salvatore, S., Scancarello, C., Baruch, Y., & Serati, M. (2023). Is Diastasis Recti Abdominis Rehabilitation After Childbirth Able to Prevent the Onset of Stress Urinary Incontinence? A Case-Control Study. Medicina, 59(12), 2182. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina59122182
  9. Chen, L., Tayban, K., Tomicich, J., Buchholz, T., Barzola, M., Mead, E., & Halpern, N. A. (2023). Point-of-Care Ultrasound (POCUS) Program for Critical Care Nurse Practitioners and Physician Assistants in an Oncological Intensive Care Unit and Rapid Response Team. Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners, 36(5), 281–285. https://doi.org/10.1097/jxx.0000000000000943
  10. Cramer, M. S., Holland, A., Boniface, E. R., Gregory, W. T., Clark, A., & Cichowski, S. (2023). Web-Based Yoga-Pilates: A Prospective Cohort Study. Urogynecology, 29(2), 252–259. https://doi.org/10.1097/spv.0000000000001285
  11. Curtain, N. E., & Gugelmin-Almeida, D. (2024). Addressing Human Factors in the Recognition and Management of Local Anaesthetic Systemic Toxicity. Journal of Perioperative Practice, 35(10), 437–442. https://doi.org/10.1177/17504589241264403
  12. East, S., Wang, Y., Yanamala, N., Maganti, K., & Sengupta, P. P. (2025). Artificial Intelligence-Enabled Point-of-Care Echocardiography: Bringing Precision Imaging to the Bedside. Current Atherosclerosis Reports, 27(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11883-025-01316-9
  13. Ford, E., Conroy, L., Dong, L., L Fong de los Santos, Greener, A., Kim, G. G., Johnson, J. L., Johnson, P. B., Mechalakos, J., Napolitano, B., Parker, S., Schofield, D., Smith, K., Yorke, E., & Wells, M. (2020). Strategies for Effective Physics Plan and Chart Review in Radiation Therapy: Report of AAPM Task Group 275. Medical Physics, 47(6). https://doi.org/10.1002/mp.14030
  14. García‐Mejido, J. A., Galán‐Paez, J., Solis‐Martín, D., Palacín, F. F., Fernández‐Palacín, A., & Sainz‐Bueno, J. A. (2025). Ultrasound Diagnosis of Pelvic Organ Prolapse Using Artificial Intelligence. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 14(11), 3634. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14113634
  15. Giarenis, I., Anding, R., Chermansky, C., Greenwell, T., Cardozo, L., & Harding, C. (2020). Do We Have Adequate Data to Construct a Valid Algorithm for Management of Synthetic Midurethral Sling Complications? ICI‐RS 2019. Neurourology and Urodynamics, 39(S3). https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.24299
  16. Hakim, S., Santoso, B., Djusad, S., Moegni, F., Surya, R., & Kurniawan, A. P. (2023). Diagnostic Capabilities of Transperineal Ultrasound (TPUS) to Evaluate Anal Sphincter Defect Post Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injury (OASIS)? A Systematic Review. Journal of Ultrasound, 26(2), 393–399. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40477-022-00763-3
  17. Hamour, A. F., Yang, W., Lee, J. W., Wu, V., Ziai, H., Singh, P., Eskander, A., Sahovaler, A., Higgins, K., Witterick, I., Vescan, A., Freeman, J. L., Almeida, J. R. d., Goldstein, D. P., Gilbert, R., Chepeha, D. B., Irish, J. C., Enepekides, D., & Monteiro, E. (2021). Association of the Implementation of a Standardized Thyroid Ultrasonography Reporting Program With Documentation of Nodule Characteristics. Jama Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery, 147(4), 343. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoto.2020.5233
  18. Heilemann, G., Georg, D., Dobiasch, M., Widder, J., & Renner, A. (2023). Increasing Quality and Efficiency of the Radiotherapy Treatment Planning Process by Constructing and Implementing a Workflow-Monitoring Application. Jco Clinical Cancer Informatics, (7). https://doi.org/10.1200/cci.23.00005
  19. Jost, E., Kosian, P., Cruz, J. J., Albarqouni, S., Gembruch, U., Strizek, B., & Recker, F. (2023). Evolving the Era of 5D Ultrasound? A Systematic Literature Review on the Applications for Artificial Intelligence Ultrasound Imaging in Obstetrics and Gynecology. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 12(21), 6833. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12216833
  20. Korfiatis, P., Kline, T. L., Meyer, H., Khalid, S., Leiner, T., Loufek, B., Blezek, D. J., Vidal, D. E., Hartman, R. P., Joppa, L. J., Missert, A., Potretzke, T. A., Taubel, J. P., Tjelta, J. A., Callstrom, M. R., & Williamson, E. E. (2025). Implementing Artificial Intelligence Algorithms in the Radiology Workflow: Challenges and Considerations. Mayo Clinic Proceedings Digital Health, 3(1), 100188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcpdig.2024.100188
  21. Li, Y., Q, L., Fu, K., Zhou, X., & Zhang, K. (2025). Progress in the Application of Artificial Intelligence in Ultrasound-Assisted Medical Diagnosis. Bioengineering, 12(3), 288. https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering12030288
  22. Mazur-Biały, A., Kołomańska-Bogucka, D., Opławski, M., & Tim, S. (2020). Physiotherapy for Prevention and Treatment of Fecal Incontinence in Women—Systematic Review of Methods. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 9(10), 3255. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9103255
  23. Mechalakos, J., Dieterich, S., Luis E. Fong de los Santos, Fontenla, S., Hanley, J., Harwalkar, V. A., Hong, L., Huang, Y. J., Kim, G. G., Richardson, S., Sutlief, S., Yaddanapudi, S., Merkel, S., & Parry, M. D. (2021). Electronic Charting of Radiation Therapy Planning and Treatment: Report of Task Group 262. Medical Physics, 48(11). https://doi.org/10.1002/mp.15116
  24. Moro, F., Giudice, M. T., Ciancia, M., Zaçe, D., Baldassari, G., Vagni, M., Tran, H. E., Scambia, G., & Testa, A. C. (2025). Application of Artificial Intelligence to Ultrasound Imaging for Benign Gynecological Disorders: Systematic Review. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 65(3), 295–302. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.29171
  25. Morytko, M. Z. (2025). Imaging Pathways in Spondyloarthritis: Integrating Radiography, Ultrasonography, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Low-Dose Computed Tomography, and Artificial Intelligence Methods. Rheumatology International, 46(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-025-06051-7
  26. Mungovan, S. F., Carlsson, S., Gass, G. C., Graham, P. L., Sandhu, J. S., Akın, O., Scardino, P. T., Eastham, J. A., & Patel, M. I. (2021). Preoperative Exercise Interventions to Optimize Continence Outcomes Following Radical Prostatectomy. Nature Reviews Urology, 18(5), 259–281. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41585-021-00445-5
  27. Notenboom‐Nas, F. J. M., Vries, G. E. K., Beijer, L., Tolsma, Y., Marijke C. Ph. Slieker‐ten Hove, Dekker, J. H., Koeveringe, G. A. v., & Blanker, M. H. (2022). Exploring Pelvic Floor Muscle Function in Men With and Without Pelvic Floor Symptoms: A Population‐based Study. Neurourology and Urodynamics, 41(8), 1739–1748. https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.24996
  28. Olakotan, O., & Yusof, M. M. (2021). The Appropriateness of Clinical Decision Support Systems Alerts in Supporting Clinical Workflows: A Systematic Review. Health Informatics Journal, 27(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/14604582211007536
  29. Pereira, G. M. V., Juliato, C. R. T., Almeida, C. M. d., Andrade, K. C. d., Fante, J. F., Martinho, N., Jales, R. M., Marcela Ponzio Pinto e Silva, & Brito, L. G. O. (2021). Effect of Radiofrequency and Pelvic Floor Muscle Training in the Treatment of Women With Vaginal Laxity: A Study Protocol. Plos One, 16(11), e0259650. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0259650
  30. Pessoa, P., Carvalho, A., & Mota, P. (2024). Prevalence of Levator Ani Muscle Injuries in Primiparous Women After Delivery and Their Influence on Pelvic Floor Disorders‐systematic Review. Neurourology and Urodynamics, 43(8), 1962–1969. https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.25529
  31. Pugliesi, R. A., Barberi, M. T., Roccella, G., Gullo, G., Billone, V., Chitoran, E., Cucinella, G., Vernuccio, F., Cannella, R., & Re, G. L. (2025). MR Defecography Improves Diagnosis of Postoperative Pelvic Floor Dysfunction After Gynecological Surgery. Diagnostics, 15(13), 1625. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15131625
  32. Qu, M. E., & Zhang, M. X. (2023). Advanced Application of Artificial Intelligence for Pelvic Floor Ultrasound in Diagnosis and Treatment. Advanced Ultrasound in Diagnosis and Therapy, 7(2), 114. https://doi.org/10.37015/audt.2023.230021
  33. Ramezani, A., Moradmand, A., & Nezami, F. R. (2025). CardiacGPT™: A Real-Time AI Assistant for Intraoperative Guidance and Postoperative Decision Support in Cardiac Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.08.30.25334720
  34. Roth, C. J., Petersilge, C. A., Cram, D., Garriott, K., Lannum, L., Carey, C. K., Medina, N., Kwiatkoski, T., Whitfill, J., & Towbin, A. J. (2024). Celebrating 10 Years of the HIMSS-SIIM Enterprise Imaging Community and Enterprise Imaging Informatics. J Digit Imaging. Inform. Med., 37(6), 2722–2728. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-024-01141-7
  35. Serati, M., Ruffolo, A. F., Scancarello, C., Braga, A., Salvatore, S., & Ghezzi, F. (2022). When Does Oasis Cause De Novo Pelvic Floor Dysfunction? Role of the Surgeon’s Skills. International Urogynecology Journal, 34(2), 493–498. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-022-05205-6
  36. Shek, K. L., & Dietz, H. P. (2025). Is Two‐dimensional Oblique Parasagittal Ultrasound Imaging Valid for Levator Ani Muscle Assessment? Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 66(1), 96–100. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.29236
  37. Shi, Z. (2025). Preoperative MRI-Based 3D Segmentation and Quantitative Modeling of Glandular and Adipose Tissues in Male Gynecomastia: A Retrospective Study. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 14(21), 7601. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14217601
  38. Spinelli, A., Laurenti, V., Carrano, F. M., González‐Díaz, E., & Borycka-Kiciak, K. (2021). Diagnosis and Treatment of Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injuries: New Evidence and Perspectives. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 10(15), 3261. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10153261
  39. Sullivan, M. E., Haraki, A. S. E., Padoa, A., Vincent, K., Whitmore, K., & Cervigni, M. (2025). Role of Gynecologic Findings in Interstitial Cystitis/Bladder Pain Syndrome: A Consensus. Neurourology and Urodynamics, 45(1), 39–45. https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.70099
  40. Swift, S. (2021). Joint Terminology Documents: Are There Too Many or Is This the Way Forward? International Urogynecology Journal, 32(12), 3103–3104. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-021-04946-0
  41. Taş, İ. S., Yaşa, C., Uğurlucan, F. G., & Yıldırım, A. (2022). Association Between Pelvic Floor Dysfunction and Pelvic Floor Ultrasonography Evaluation in Pregnant Women: A Cross-Sectional Study. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 49(9). https://doi.org/10.31083/j.ceog4909203
  42. Vicari, D. D., Barba, M., Cola, A., Costa, C., Palucci, M., & Frigerio, M. (2025). AI-Enhanced 3D Transperineal Ultrasound: Advancing Biometric Measurements for Precise Prolapse Severity Assessment. Bioengineering, 12(7), 754. https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering12070754
  43. Wei, N., Li, X., Lu, X., Liu, X., Sun, R., & Wang, Y. (2024). Study on the Consistency Between Automatic Measurement Based on Convolutional Neural Network Technology and Manual Visual Evaluation in Intracavitary Ultrasonic Cine of Anterior Pelvic. Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine, 43(4), 671–681. https://doi.org/10.1002/jum.16392
  44. Weinstein, M. M., Collins, S., Quiroz, L. H., Anger, J. T., Paraiso, M. F. R., DeLong, J., & Richter, H. E. (2021). Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial of Pelvic Floor Muscle Training With a Motion-Based Digital Therapeutic Device Versus Pelvic Floor Muscle Training Alone for Treatment of Stress-Predominant Urinary Incontinence. Female Pelvic Medicine & Reconstructive Surgery, 28(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1097/spv.0000000000001052
  45. Wellnhofer, E. (2022). Real-World and Regulatory Perspectives of Artificial Intelligence in Cardiovascular Imaging. Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2022.890809
  46. Xia, P., LaHurd, D., Qi, P., Mastroianni, A., Lee, D., Magnelli, A., Murray, E., Kolar, M., Guo, B., Meier, T., Chao, S. T., Suh, J. H., & Yu, N. (2020). Combining Automatic Plan Integrity Check (APIC) With Standard Plan Document and Checklist Method to Reduce Errors in Treatment Planning. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics, 21(9), 124–133. https://doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12981
  47. Yan, S., Xiong, F., Xin, Y., Zhou, Z., & Liu, W. (2024). Optimizing Evaluation of Endometrial Receptivity in Recurrent Pregnancy Loss: A Preliminary Investigation Integrating Radiomics From Multimodal Ultrasound via Machine Learning. Frontiers in Endocrinology, 15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2024.1380829
  48. Youssef, A., Brunelli, E., Pilu, G., & Dietz, H. P. (2021). The Maternal Pelvic Floor and Labor Outcome. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology MFM, 3(6), 100452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajogmf.2021.100452
  49. Zhu, S., Chen, G., Chen, H., Lu, Y., Wu, M., Zheng, B., Liu, D., Qian, C., & Chen, Y. (2024). Squeeze‐and‐excitation‐attention‐based Mobile Vision Transformer for Grading Recognition of Bladder Prolapse in Pelvic MRI Images. Medical Physics, 51(8), 5236–5249. https://doi.org/10.1002/mp.17171