International Journal of Clinical Science and Medical Research

Background: One significant pre-analytical factor affecting semen quality and semen analysis interpretation is the length of ejaculatory abstinence. The World Health Organization advises abstinence for two to seven days before semen collection; however, the ideal length of time is still debatable, especially for men whose semen quality is compromised. This study examined the relationship between the length of ejaculatory abstinence and the quality of semen in Nigerian men who were oligozoospermic and normozoospermic and undergoing fertility testing.

Methods: A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted using laboratory semen analysis records of 268 male partners of infertile couples who underwent fertility evaluation between January 2023 and December 2025. Participants were categorized into normozoospermic (≥15 × 10⁶ sperm/mL) and oligozoospermic (<15 × 10⁶ sperm/mL) groups according to WHO 2010 criteria. The period of ejaculatory abstinence was divided into three categories: 2–3 days, 4–7 days, and >7 days. Standardized WHO laboratory protocols were used to analyse semen samples. Semen characteristics were examined between abstinence groups, including volume, sperm count, concentration, motility, morphology, and proportion of dead spermatozoa. To find correlations between age, semen characteristics, and the length of abstinence, correlation analyses were conducted. Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05.

Results: Of the 268 participants, 126 (47.0%) were normozoospermic, and 142 (53.0%) were oligozoospermic. The majority of participants (66.8%) stated that they had abstained for four to seven days. Sperm count, sperm concentration, percentage of dead spermatozoa, motility, and morphology all showed significant differences between the two groups (P < 0.05). Abstinence time had a significant impact on sperm count and concentration in oligozoospermic men, while it had a significant impact on sperm count, concentration, semen volume, motility, and morphology in normozoospermic men. In oligozoospermic men, abstinence duration was significantly correlated negatively with both rapid progressive and non-progressive motility, whereas in normozoospermic men, it was positively correlated with semen volume.

Conclusion: Although its effects vary depending on baseline semen quality, ejaculatory abstinence length has a considerable impact on conventional semen characteristics. Long-term abstinence seems to negatively impact sperm motility, especially in oligozoospermic males, even if it may increase semen volume and sperm concentration. These results support tailored recommendations on the length of abstinence during assisted reproductive treatment and fertility assessment.

Ejaculatory abstinence, Semen quality, Male infertility, Sperm motility, Oligozoospermia, Normozoospermia, Nigeria, Semen analysis

1. World Health Organization. Infertility prevalence estimates, 1990–2021. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2023.
2. World Health Organization. WHO laboratory manual for the examination and processing of human semen. 6th ed. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2021.
3. Agarwal A, Baskaran S, Parekh N, Cho CL, Henkel R, Vij S, et al. Male infertility. Lancet. 2021;397(10271):319-333.
4. Schlegel PN, Sigman M, Collura B, De Jonge CJ, Eisenberg ML, Lamb DJ, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of infertility in men: AUA/ASRM guideline Part I. Fertil Steril. 2021;115(1):54-61.
5. Esteves SC, Roque M, Garrido N. Clinical utility of routine semen analysis in the era of advanced sperm function testing. Andrology. 2021;9(6):1719-1731.
6. Ombelet W. The burden of infertility in sub-Saharan Africa. Facts Views Vis Obgyn. 2020;12(2):89-94.
7. Durairajanayagam D. Lifestyle causes of male infertility. Arab J Urol. 2018;16(1):10-20.
8. Agarwal A, Baskaran S, Finelli R, Leisegang K, Panner Selvam MK, Barbarosie C, et al. The current global status of male infertility. World J Mens Health. 2021;39(4):589-606.
9. Lo Giudice A, Asmundo MG, Cimino S, Cocci A, Falcone M, Capece M, et al. Effects of long and short ejaculatory abstinence on sperm parameters: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2024;15:1373426.
10. Du C, Li Y, Yin C, Luo X. Association of abstinence time with semen quality and fertility outcomes: a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis. Andrology. 2024;12:1224-1235.
11. Raditya M, Soejono AH, Siswanto MA, Atmoko W, Shah R, Agarwal A, et al. Impact of shorter abstinence periods on semen parameters: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Mens Health. 2024;42. doi:10.5534/wjmh.240035.
12. Borges E Jr, Braga DPAF, Zanetti BF, Iaconelli A Jr, Setti AS. Revisiting the impact of ejaculatory abstinence on semen quality and intracytoplasmic sperm injection outcomes. Andrology. 2019;7(2):213-219. doi:10.1111/andr.12572.
13. Levitas E, Lunenfeld E, Weiss N, Friger M, Har-Vardi I, Koifman A, et al. Relationship between the duration of sexual abstinence and semen quality: analysis of 9,489 semen samples. Fertil Steril. 2005;83(6):1680-1686. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2004.12.045.
14. Agarwal A, Virk G, Ong C, du Plessis SS. Effect of oxidative stress on male reproduction. World J Mens Health. 2014;32(1):1-17. doi:10.5534/wjmh.2014.32.1.1.
15. Walke G, Gaurkar SS, Prasad R, Lohakare T, Wanjari M. The impact of oxidative stress on male reproductive function: exploring the role of antioxidant supplementation. Cureus. 2023;15(7):e42583. doi:10.7759/cureus.42583.
16. Baskaran S, Finelli R, Agarwal A, Henkel R. Reactive oxygen species in male reproduction: a boon or a bane? Andrologia. 2021;53(1):e13577. doi:10.1111/and.13577.
17. Agarwal A, Majzoub A, Baskaran S, Panner Selvam MK, Cho CL, Henkel R, Finelli R, Leisegang K, Sengupta P, Barbarosie C, Parekh N, Alves MG, Ko E, Arafa M, Tadros N, Ramasamy R, Kavoussi P, Ambar R, Kuchakulla M, Robert KA, et al. Sperm DNA fragmentation: a new guideline for clinicians. World J Mens Health. 2020;38(4):412-471. doi:10.5534/wjmh.200128.
18. Esteves SC, Zini A, Coward RM, Evenson DP, Gosálvez J, Lewis SEM, Sharma R, Humaidan P. Sperm DNA fragmentation testing: summary evidence and clinical practice recommendations. Andrologia. 2021;53(2):e13874. doi:10.1111/and.13874.
19. Simon L, Emery BR, Carrell DT. Diagnosis and impact of sperm DNA alterations in assisted reproduction. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2017;44:38-56. doi:10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2017.07.003.
20. Sharma R, Biedenharn KR, Fedor JM, Agarwal A. Lifestyle factors and reproductive health: taking control of your fertility. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2013;11:66.
21. Esteves SC. Clinical relevance of routine semen analysis and controversies surrounding the 2010 World Health Organization criteria for semen examination. Int Braz J Urol. 2014;40(4):443-453. doi:10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2014.04.02.
22. Boitrelle F, Shah R, Saleh R, Henkel R, Kandil H, Chung E, Vogiatzi P, Zini A, Arafa M, Agarwal A. The sixth edition of the WHO manual for human semen analysis: a critical review and SWOT analysis. Life (Basel). 2021;11(12):1368. doi:10.3390/

De Jonge CJ, Barratt CLR. The present crisis in male reproductive health: an urgent need for a political, social, and research roadmap. Andrology. 2019;7(6):762-768. doi:10.1111/andr.12673.